Johnson v. District of Columbia
37 F.2d 448, 59 App. D.C. 167, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2037
Opinion
These are writs of error to the municipal court, and involve an interpretation of the Act of June 4,1924 (43 Stat. 367). Since the facts in these cases do not differ materially from the facts in District of Columbia v. Newman (No. 4803) 59 App. D. C. 163, 37 F.(2d) 444, decided February 25, 1929, in which an application for rehearing has this day been denied, the judgments in these eases are affirmed, with costs, on the authority of that case.
Affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. District of Columbia, 37 F.2d 448, 59 App. D.C. 167, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2037 (D.C. Cir. 1929).
37 F.2d 448 (Johnson v. District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
District of Columbia v. Newman
37 F.2d 444 (D.C. Circuit, 1929)