Johnson v. District of Columbia

D.C. Circuit

Johnson v. District of Columbia

37 F.2d 448, 59 App. D.C. 167, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2037

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedDecember 2, 1929

DocketNos. 5013, 5014

StatusPublished

This text of 37 F.2d 448 (Johnson v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. District of Columbia, 37 F.2d 448, 59 App. D.C. 167, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2037 (D.C. Cir. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These are writs of error to the municipal court, and involve an interpretation of the Act of June 4,1924 (43 Stat. 367). Since the facts in these cases do not differ materially from the facts in District of Columbia v. Newman (No. 4803) 59 App. D. C. 163, 37 F.(2d) 444, decided February 25, 1929, in which an application for rehearing has this day been denied, the judgments in these eases are affirmed, with costs, on the authority of that case.

Affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

These are writs of error to the municipal court, and involve an interpretation of the Act of June 4,1924 (43 Stat. 367). Since the facts in these cases do not differ materially from the facts in District of Columbia v. Newman (No. 4803) 59 App. D. C. 163, 37 F.(2d) 444, decided February 25, 1929, in which an application for rehearing has this day been denied, the judgments in these eases are affirmed, with costs, on the authority of that case.

Affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 F.2d 448, 59 App. D.C. 167, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-district-of-columbia-cadc-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack