Johnson v. Director of Revenue

237 S.W.3d 291, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1570, 2007 WL 3342374
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 13, 2007
Docket28615
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 237 S.W.3d 291 (Johnson v. Director of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Director of Revenue, 237 S.W.3d 291, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1570, 2007 WL 3342374 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Director of Revenue appeals a judgment of the circuit court of Phelps County ordering the director to reinstate the driving privileges of Diana Johnson which were revoked pursuant to § 577.041, RSMo 2000. This court reverses and remands.

The director filed a motion asking this court to remand the case to the trial court for a hearing on the record. From the trial court’s docket sheets and judgment, it can be discerned that a hearing was held and evidence presented; yet a letter from the court reporter indicates that no record of the hearing was made. Ms. Johnson asserts that a transcript is unnecessary for our determination on appeal because “[t]he only evidence put forth in the entire case was the Exhibit A submitted by the Director.”

From the documents presented, it is unclear whether Exhibit A was the only evidence. Because it is unclear what evidence the trial court had before it, this court may not speculate on the evidentiary basis for the trial court’s decision. Roberts v. Director of Revenue, 959 S.W.2d 949, 950 (Mo.App.1998); Wolansky v. Director of Revenue, 936 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Mo.App.1996). “Nonexistence of the transcript of the trial precludes appellate review and requires that the judgment of the trial court be reversed and remanded to permit the parties to try the case with a proper record.” Silman v. Director of *292 Revenue, 914 S.W.2d 832 (Mo.App.1996); see also, Holt v. Director of Revenue, 926 S.W.2d 532, 533 (Mo.App.1996); Koehr v. Director of Revenue, 813 S.W.2d 363, 364 (Mo.App.1991).

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial on the record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 S.W.3d 291, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1570, 2007 WL 3342374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-director-of-revenue-moctapp-2007.