Johnson v. Director of Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives

• Court: District Court, District of Columbia
• Decided: May 31, 2016
• Docket: Civil Action No. 2015-1678
• Status: Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) ALAN WADE JOHNSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-1678 (BAH) ) BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, ) FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 22, 2016, the defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Defs.’ Mot.

Summ. J., ECF No. 10. The Court advised the plaintiff of his obligations under the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond to the motion, and

specifically warned the plaintiff that, if he did not respond to the defendants’ motion by March

31, 2016, the Court may treat the motion as conceded. Order, ECF No. 11. The plaintiff

subsequently moved for appointment of counsel, Pl.’s Mot. Appoint Counsel, ECF No. 12,

which motion was denied, while at the same time, the Court extended the plaintiff’s deadline to

respond to the pending summary judgment motion until May 6, 2016, Order, ECF No. 13. To

date, however, the plaintiff has neither filed an opposition to the motion and nor requested more

time to do so.

1 Rather than granting the defendants’ motion as conceded, the Court instead will deny

their motion without prejudice and dismiss the complaint without prejudice. If the plaintiff

chooses to proceed with this case, he may file a motion to reopen it.

An Order is issued separately.

/s/ Beryl A. Howell BERYL A. HOWELL United States District Judge DATE: May 31, 2016