Johnson v. Dillwyn Correctional Center

Fourth Circuit

Johnson v. Dillwyn Correctional Center

239 F. App'x 835

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 6, 2007·No. No. 07-6582·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Phillip E. Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Dillwyn Corr. Ctr., No. 7:07-cv-00107-jct, 2007 WL 781933 (W.D. Va. Mar. 13, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Phillip E. Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Dillwyn Corr. Ctr., No. 7:07-cv-00107-jct, 2007 WL 781933 (W.D. Va. Mar. 13, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Johnson v. Dillwyn Correctional Center, 239 F. App'x 835 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

239 F. App'x 835 (Johnson v. Dillwyn Correctional Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related