Johnson v. Department of Defense

102 F. App'x 691
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. Department of Defense. Read the opinion of the Court — 97 F. App'x 325
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided June 10, 2004·No. No. 03-3266·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Annie R. Johnson seeks review of the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board dismissing her appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Johnson v. Dep’t of Defense, No. AT3443020766-I-1, 2003 WL 21458241 (M.S.P.B. Jun.19, 2003). Because Johnson was reassigned to a different position without a change in grade level, step or salary, and because Johnson’s former position was not upgraded due to a new or corrected classification standard, the board had no authority to address her appeal pursuant to 5 U.S.C. §§ 7512 and 7513. See Pawn v. Dep’t of the Navy, 265 F.3d 1346, 1348 (Fed.Cir. 2001) (“In order for a reassignment to fall within the Board’s jurisdiction, it must result in a reduction in grade or a reduction in pay.”); see also Spencer v. Dep’t of the Navy, 327 F.3d 1354, 1356 (Fed.Cir.2003). Accordingly, we affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Department of Defense, 102 F. App'x 691 (Fed. Cir. 2004).

102 F. App'x 691 (Johnson v. Department of Defense) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Craig Pann v. Department of the Navy
265 F.3d 1346 (Federal Circuit, 2001)
Ronald L. Spencer v. Department of the Navy
327 F.3d 1354 (Federal Circuit, 2003)