Johnson v. De Toledo

767 A.2d 1212, 255 Conn. 938, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 48

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided February 7, 2001·No. SC 16475·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaiutiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 61 Conn. App. 156 (AC 19289), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court had used the proper standard of proof in discharging the plaintiffs mechanic’s lien?”

VERTEFET TTLLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaiutiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 61 Conn. App. 156 (AC 19289), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court had used the proper standard of proof in discharging the plaintiffs mechanic’s lien?”

VERTEFET TTLLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Johnson v. De Toledo, 767 A.2d 1212, 255 Conn. 938, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 48 (Colo. 2001).

Pincite

767 A.2d 1212 (Johnson v. De Toledo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Johnson v. De Toledo

785 A.2d 192 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)

Opinion

Related