Johnson v. Davis
This text of 271 S.W. 551 (Johnson v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion op the Court by
Granting appeal and reversing.
Plaintiff sued on an alleged promissory note for $375.00. The petition contained the usual declaration upon a promissory note, except it did not allege any promise upon the part of defendant to pay.
The court overruled a demurrer to the petition and gave judgment for the amount claimed. This was error; the allegation of the execution and delivery of the note without an averment of a promise to pay was a mere con *497 elusion of law. It follows that no cause of action was stated. Huffaker v. National Bank of Monticello, 12 Bush 291; Davis v. Moxley, 19 Rep. 160; Bank of Anderson County v. Foster, 146 Ky. 179.
Wherefore, an appeal is granted, the judgment is reversed and cause remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 S.W. 551, 208 Ky. 496, 1925 Ky. LEXIS 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-davis-kyctapphigh-1925.