Johnson v. Czumaj

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Johnson v. Czumaj

29 A.D.2d 827, 288 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4680

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1968

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 A.D.2d 827 (Johnson v. Czumaj) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Czumaj, 29 A.D.2d 827, 288 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4680 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In affirming, we disapprove the court’s action in answering the jury’s written question without its being presented in open court, but in this case we do not find that doing so was prejudicial. (See Employers Mut. Liab. Ins. Co. v. Di Cesare & Monaco Concrete Constr. Corp., 9 A D 2d 379, 385; Fisher v. Lober, 11 A D 2d 645; Gundersen V. All America Commerce Corp., 275 App. Div. 572; 8 CarmodyWait 2d, New York Practice, §§ 57:22, 58.3; 1 N Y P J I 6). (Appeal from judgment of Erie Trial Term, dismissing complaint in automobile negligence action.) Present — ■ Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Vecchio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In affirming, we disapprove the court’s action in answering the jury’s written question without its being presented in open court, but in this case we do not find that doing so was prejudicial. (See Employers Mut. Liab. Ins. Co. v. Di Cesare & Monaco Concrete Constr. Corp., 9 A D 2d 379, 385; Fisher v. Lober, 11 A D 2d 645; Gundersen V. All America Commerce Corp., 275 App. Div. 572; 8 CarmodyWait 2d, New York Practice, §§ 57:22, 58.3; 1 N Y P J I 6). (Appeal from judgment of Erie Trial Term, dismissing complaint in automobile negligence action.) Present — ■ Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Del Vecchio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 827, 288 N.Y.S.2d 866, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-czumaj-nyappdiv-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack