Johnson v. Cuddington

35 Ind. 43
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1871
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 35 Ind. 43 (Johnson v. Cuddington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Cuddington, 35 Ind. 43 (Ind. 1871).

Opinion

Downey, C. J.

Action for trespass quare clausum fregit. Answer, first, general denial; second and third, justification. Demurrers sustained to the second and third paragraphs. Trial by the court. Special finding by request, in which the court found the acts of trespass, and the amount of the plaintiff’s damages, but, going beyond anything in the issue, found that two of the defendants were supervisors of highways, acting under an order to open a highway, and that the other two were acting under their authority. Conclusion of law, that the defendants were not liable for the damages. Exception taken, and also a motion made by the plaintiff for judgment on the findings, overruled, and exception entered.

These rulings were wrong. The court had no authority to find a justification of the acts of trespass under the issue. 2 G. & H. 93, sec. 66; Wood v. Mansell, 3 Blackf. 125.

The judgment is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded, with directions to the circuit court to render judgment for the plaintiff for twenty-three dollars and seventy-five cents, the amount in the special finding, and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hawke v. Maus
226 N.E.2d 713 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1967)
Hill v. Hagaman
84 Ind. 287 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1882)
Boaz v. Tate
43 Ind. 60 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1873)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Ind. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-cuddington-ind-1871.