Johnson v. Cruden
This text of Johnson v. Cruden (Johnson v. Cruden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6003
JAMES ARTIS JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JEFFREY J. CRUDEN; RUDY E. RENFER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:08-ct-03082-BO)
Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 27, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Artis Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
James Artis Johnson appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Johnson v. Cruden, No. 5:08-ct-03082-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec.
17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Johnson v. Cruden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-cruden-ca4-2009.