Johnson v. Crown Heights Community Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Johnson v. Crown Heights Community Corp.

39 A.D.2d 872, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4247

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 39 A.D.2d 872 (Johnson v. Crown Heights Community Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Crown Heights Community Corp., 39 A.D.2d 872, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4247 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 27, 1972, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and the matter is remanded to New York City Council Against Poverty (CAP) for further proceedings, with leave to respondents to serve and file an answer herein (see CPLR 7804, subd. [e]). In reversing we hold only that petitioner is entitled to the prescribed procedural safeguards (cf. Securities Comm. v. Cheney Corp., 318 U. S. 80), and find, as did CAP, that petitioner “ did not receive due process as mandated by the Council Against Poverty.” Concur—Stevens, P. J., MeCivern, Markewich, Kupferman and Steuer, JJ. [39 A D 2d 889.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 27, 1972, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and the matter is remanded to New York City Council Against Poverty (CAP) for further proceedings, with leave to respondents to serve and file an answer herein (see CPLR 7804, subd. [e]). In reversing we hold only that petitioner is entitled to the prescribed procedural safeguards (cf. Securities Comm. v. Cheney Corp., 318 U. S. 80), and find, as did CAP, that petitioner “ did not receive due process as mandated by the Council Against Poverty.” Concur—Stevens, P. J., MeCivern, Markewich, Kupferman and Steuer, JJ. [39 A D 2d 889.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.2d 872, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-crown-heights-community-corp-nyappdiv-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack