Johnson v. Crescent Creamery Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Johnson v. Crescent Creamery Co.

153 N.W. 525, 130 Minn. 533, 1915 Minn. LEXIS 619

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJuly 2, 1915

DocketNos. 19,354—(232)

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 153 N.W. 525 (Johnson v. Crescent Creamery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Crescent Creamery Co., 153 N.W. 525, 130 Minn. 533, 1915 Minn. LEXIS 619 (Mich. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff was injured in the same accident as was the plaintiff in Sherwood [534]*534v. Crescent Creamery Company, supra, page 263, 153 N. W. 525. Hie only claim on this appeal is that the verdict of $2,500 is excessive. We have examined the testimony and conclude that the verdict, while liberal, is not so out of proportion to fair compensation for the conditions testified to by plaintiff and her witnesses that we ought to interfere.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff was injured in the same accident as was the plaintiff in Sherwood [534]*534v. Crescent Creamery Company, supra, page 263, 153 N. W. 525. Hie only claim on this appeal is that the verdict of $2,500 is excessive. We have examined the testimony and conclude that the verdict, while liberal, is not so out of proportion to fair compensation for the conditions testified to by plaintiff and her witnesses that we ought to interfere.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

153 N.W. 525, 130 Minn. 533, 1915 Minn. LEXIS 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-crescent-creamery-co-minn-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack