Johnson v. Crawford
This text of 167 F. App'x 596 (Johnson v. Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Daniel Gene Johnson appeals from the district court’s denial of his habeas petition alleging violations of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, 18 U.S.C.App. 2 § 2 (“IADA”.) We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.
Subsequent to the district court’s denial of Johnson’s petition, Johnson was extradited to Oklahoma and pled guilty to all pending charges. To the extent that Johnson challenges his detention in Nevada as violating provisions of the IADA, this appeal is moot. See Fendler v. United States Bureau of Prisons, 846 F.2d 550, 555 (9th Cir.1988). To the extent that Johnson challenges the failure of the Oklahoma court to rule on his motion to dismiss the charges against him, the district court lacks jurisdiction over this claim. See United States v. Black, 609 F.2d 1330, 1333 (9th Cir.1979). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 F. App'x 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-crawford-ca9-2006.