Johnson v. Cox

Eighth Circuit

Johnson v. Cox

13 F. App'x 435

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJuly 10, 2001

DocketNo. 00-3865

StatusPublished

This text of 13 F. App'x 435 (Johnson v. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Cox, 13 F. App'x 435 (8th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Janice Johnson appeals the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of Johnson’s civil rights complaint against a prison official, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Having reviewed the record and Johnson’s brief, we conclude the court did not commit error in dismissing her complaint. See McAlphin v. Morgan, 216 F.3d 680, 682 (8th Cir.[436]*4362000) (per curiam). We affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Janice Johnson appeals the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of Johnson’s civil rights complaint against a prison official, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Having reviewed the record and Johnson’s brief, we conclude the court did not commit error in dismissing her complaint. See McAlphin v. Morgan, 216 F.3d 680, 682 (8th Cir.[436]*4362000) (per curiam). We affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 F. App'x 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-cox-ca8-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack