Johnson v. Court of Philadelphia

115 A.3d 311, 631 Pa. 611, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 1177
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 29, 2015·No. 39 EM 2015·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of *612 Mandamus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 608 Pa. 71, 10 A.3d 282, 293 (2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Court of Philadelphia, 115 A.3d 311, 631 Pa. 611, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 1177 (Pa. 2015).

115 A.3d 311 (Johnson v. Court of Philadelphia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Ali
10 A.3d 282 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)