Johnson v. Coombe

228 A.D.2d 755, 644 N.Y.2d 72, 644 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6396
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 6, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 228 A.D.2d 755 (Johnson v. Coombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Coombe, 228 A.D.2d 755, 644 N.Y.2d 72, 644 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6396 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

[756]*756As the result of an incident in which petitioner passed balloons containing contraband to another inmate, petitioner was found guilty of smuggling and possessing a controlled substance. He challenges this determination, contending, inter alia, that he was denied adequate employee assistance and that the Hearing Officer improperly denied his request to call certain witnesses. Although petitioner contends that his assistant failed to provide him with certain documents, the record reveals that petitioner received some of these documents at the hearing and that the ones he did not receive were unavailable. Moreover, many of the witnesses who petitioner claims his assistant failed to interview testified at the hearing. Because petitioner has not demonstrated that he was prejudiced by his assistant’s alleged deficiencies, we reject his claim that he was denied adequate employee assistance (see, Matter of Dawes v Coughlin, 217 AD2d 726, lv denied 86 NY2d 712).

In addition, the Hearing Officer was under no obligation to call witnesses whose testimony was redundant or irrelevant. Therefore, we reject petitioner’s argument that the Hearing Officer improperly denied his request to call certain witnesses. We have considered petitioner’s remaining claims and find them to be without merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Goord
307 A.D.2d 564 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Encarnacion v. Goord
286 A.D.2d 828 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Serrano v. Goord
266 A.D.2d 661 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Moley v. Selsky
245 A.D.2d 588 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Barnhill v. Coombe
239 A.D.2d 719 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Flynn v. Coombe
239 A.D.2d 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Hazel v. Coombe
239 A.D.2d 736 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Greene v. Coombe
238 A.D.2d 813 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Llull v. Coombe
238 A.D.2d 761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Applegate v. Coombe
237 A.D.2d 836 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Lewis v. Lacy
233 A.D.2d 637 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D.2d 755, 644 N.Y.2d 72, 644 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-coombe-nyappdiv-1996.