Johnson v. Connecticut Department of Corrections

225 F. App'x 42
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided June 5, 2007·No. No. 06-2611-cv·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[43]*43SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff Bruce Johnson appeals pro se from a judgment of May 2, 2006, entered pursuant to decisions of the District Court granting defendant’s initial and supplemental motions for summary judgment. See Johnson v. State of Conn. Dep’t of Corr., 392 F.Supp.2d 326 (D.Conn.2005) (granting in part and denying in part defendant’s initial motion for summary judgment); Johnson v. State of Conn. Dep’t of Corr., 428 F.Supp.2d 87 (D.Conn.2006) (granting defendant’s supplemental motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs remaining claims).

Plaintiff’s amended complaint alleged discrimination and retaliation on the basis of his race and religion, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, the issues on appeal and the procedural history.

Having carefully reviewed all of plaintiffs arguments, we affirm the District Court’s decisions for substantially the same reasons set forth in those decisions.

We have considered all of plaintiffs arguments on appeal and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, we hereby AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Connecticut Department of Corrections, 225 F. App'x 42 (2d Cir. 2007).

225 F. App'x 42 (Johnson v. Connecticut Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Benedith v. Malverne Union Free School District
38 F. Supp. 3d 286 (E.D. New York, 2014)