Johnson v. Commissioner
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILES,
Petitioner resided in Goleta, California, when he filed his 1973 and 1974 returns with the Internal Revenue Service Center at Fresno, California, and in Arroyo Grande, California, when he filed his petition in this case. In the notice of deficiency, respondent disallowed a portion of the amount claimed on each return as employee business expenses for automobile expenses for lack of substantiation and for failure to show that the claimed expenses were incurred while away from home in connection with a trade or business. Respondent also disallowed for lack of substantiation the amount petitioner deducted for sales tax on his 1973 return.
In his petition, *210 petitioner does not contest the merits of the deficiencies by alleging facts supportive of the deductions he took. Instead, he makes general assignments of error. He claims that the Commissioner's disallowance of his deductions was arbitrary and capricious with malice towards him personally, though alleges no facts to support this contention. He further challenges: (1) his burden to prove respondent's determination wrong, (2) the Tax Court's status as a Court, (3) the denial of a jury trial when before the Tax Court, and (4) the denial of the right to petition to government for a redress of grievances in addition to other constitutional rights. His position is based on the United States Constitution, the Holy Bible, the Federalist Papers, and other documents.
Petitioner's contentions have been addressed and rejected in numerous prior opinions of this and other courts.
In his "Motion For Summary Judgment," petitioner states that he offered to tender payment for the deficiencies on the condition that respondent certify the deficiencies as "true, correct and certain." Since respondent refused to certify the amounts owed by signing petitioner's "Affidavit For Citizen's Protection," petitioner contends that that in itself is sufficient to show the arbitrary nature of respondent's "fictitious determination" and therefore Summary Judgment should be rendered in his favor. Petitioner's contention is without merit because there is no requirement that respondent's determinations be accompanied or certified by an affidavit. Cf.
To reflect the foregoing,
Footnotes
1. See also
.Rice v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1978-334↩
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1979 T.C. Memo. 313 (Johnson v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.