Johnson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided September 8, 2020·No. 3:19-cv-01189-MC·Unknown

Opinion

H. Peter Evans, OSB 012532 Attorney for Plaintiff Evans & Evans, PC 520 SW Sixth Avenue, Suite 1050 Portland, OR 97204 Ph. 503-200-2723; Fx. 360-828-8724 peter@evans-evans.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

CORY E. JOHNSON, Case No. #3:19-cv-01189-MC Plaintiff,

v. ORDER FOR FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY U.S.C. § 2412(d) ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

It is hereby ORDERED that fees in the amount of $7,388.76 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The parties agree that attorney and paralegal fees in the amount of $7,388.76 will be paid to Plaintiff’s attorney, subject to verification that Plaintiff does not have a debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made out to Plaintiff’s attorney, H. Peter Evans: 222 NE Park Plaza Drive, Suite 113, Vancouver, WA 98684. If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made out to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney’s office at the address stated above. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this __8_th____ day of ___S_e_p_te_m__b_e_r______ 2020.

s/Michael J. McShane MICHAEL J. MCSHANE United States District Judge Proposed Order submitted on August 20, 2020.

/s/ H. Peter Evans H.Peter Evans, OSB 012532 Attorney for Plaintiff

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2020).

Johnson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Johnson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)