Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 12 BRENDA M. JOHNSON, 13 Plaintiff, Case No. C20-6058 RAJ 14 ORDER STAYING v. 15 PROCEEDINGS PENDING DISPOSITION OF APPEAL COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 16 SECURITY, 17 Defendant. 18 Plaintiff filed an appeal to the Ninth Circuit challenging several orders of this 19 Court, none of which was a final order. Dkt. 41. Although the filing of an interlocutory 20 appeal does not automatically stay proceedings in the district court, the district court has 21 broad discretion to decide whether a stay is appropriate to “promote economy of time and 22 effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.” Filtrol Corp. v. Kelleher, 467 F.2d 242, 23 1 244 (9th Cir. 1972) (quotations and citations omitted); see also Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 2 418, 433 (2009) (Whether to issue a stay is an exercise of judicial discretion.). 3 The appealed orders include the order transferring this case to the undersigned. 4 See Dkt. 41 at 1, Dkt. 37. Because a reversal on appeal might affect the validity of 5 proceedings conducted before the appeal process concluded, the Court concludes 6 economy of time and effort for itself and the parties would be not be served by 7 conducting further proceedings at this time. 8 Accordingly, the Court STAYS all proceedings in this case, pending disposition of 9 Plaintiff’s appeal to the Ninth Circuit. 10 DATED this 21st day of September, 2021. 11

12 A

13 14 The Honorable Richard A. Jones United States District Judge 15

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23