Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. New York
DecidedFebruary 28, 2022
Docket5:21-cv-00226
StatusUnknown

This text of Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security (Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security, (N.D.N.Y. 2022).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ________________________________________

JENNIFER J.,

Plaintiff,

v. 5:21-cv-0226 (ML) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant. ________________________________________

APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL:

LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH HILLER, PLLC KENNETH R. HILLER, ESQ. Counsel for the Plaintiff 6000 North Bailey Avenue - Suite 1A Amherst, New York 14226

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION JAMES J. NAGELBERG, ESQ. Counsel for the Defendant Special Assistant United States J.F.K. Federal Building Attorney 15 New Sudbury Street Boston, Massachusetts 02203

MIROSLAV LOVRIC, United States Magistrate Judge

CONSENT ORDER TO REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE 4 OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)

This matter having been opened to the Court by CARLA B. FREEDMAN, United States Attorney for the Northern District of New York, and James J. Nagelberg, Special Assistant United States Attorney, attorneys for Defendant, for an Order remanding the within cause of action to the Defendant pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) so that further administrative action, including a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge and the issuance of a new decision, may be taken; and Plaintiff, through counsel Kenneth R. Hiller, having consented to the within order and the requested remand (Dkt. No. 19), and the Court having considered the matter, IT IS on this 28" day of February, 2022, ORDERED that the final decision of the Commissioner be and hereby is REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Defendant for this further administrative action; and it is further ORDERED that the within matter, be and hereby is, DISMISSED in accord with the decision in Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991); and it is further ORDERED that nothing within this consent order shall be deemed to bar Plaintiff from seeking attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 42 U.S.C. § 2412.

Dated: February 28, 2022 Binghamton, New York

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Melkonyan v. Sullivan
501 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-commissioner-of-social-security-nynd-2022.