Johnson v. Commissioner

305 F. App'x 885
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. Commissioner. Read the opinion of the Court — 55 F. App'x 204
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 14, 2004·No. No. 03-2088·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Robert C. Johnson appeals from the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to affirm the bankruptcy court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Internal Revenue Service. Our review of the record and the opinions below discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Johnson v. Commissioner, IRS, 301 B.R. 707 (D.S.C.2003). We deny Johnson’s motion for an injunction pending appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Commissioner, 305 F. App'x 885 (4th Cir. 2004).

305 F. App'x 885 (Johnson v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. COMMISSIONER, IRS
301 B.R. 707 (D. South Carolina, 2003)