Johnson v. Columbia Phonograph Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Johnson v. Columbia Phonograph Co.

106 F. 319, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4635

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 28, 1901

DocketNos. 12, 13

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 106 F. 319 (Johnson v. Columbia Phonograph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Columbia Phonograph Co., 106 F. 319, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4635 (circtedpa 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

The practice adopted in Russell v. Repeating Arms Co. (C. C.) 97 Fed. 634, and followed In two instances-in the Southern district of 3srew York, is certainly exceptional. The propriety of its enforcement in those cases need not be questioned,' but I have not been convinced that it should be insisted upon in those now before this court. Therefore the defendants’ motions to require the complainant to specify the claims relied on are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

The practice adopted in Russell v. Repeating Arms Co. (C. C.) 97 Fed. 634, and followed In two instances-in the Southern district of 3srew York, is certainly exceptional. The propriety of its enforcement in those cases need not be questioned,' but I have not been convinced that it should be insisted upon in those now before this court. Therefore the defendants’ motions to require the complainant to specify the claims relied on are denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 F. 319, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-columbia-phonograph-co-circtedpa-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack