Johnson v. . Cole

New York Court of Appeals

Johnson v. . Cole

72 N.E. 1146, 180 N.Y. 530, 1905 N.Y. LEXIS 1113

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. . Cole. Read the opinion of the Court — 178 N.Y. 364 →

New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 17, 1905·Published

Opinion

Bartlett, J.

The motion should be denied, without costs. The opinion as originally written gave costs to the appellants in all the courts to abide the event. Prior to handing down the decision the opinion was amended by striking out the words “ to the appellants,” but owing to an oversight these words were not stricken from the copy of the opinion sent to the state reporter, and it was erroneously reported in 178 N. Y. 364, in its unamended form.

Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ., concur.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bartlett, J.

The motion should be denied, without costs. The opinion as originally written gave costs to the appellants in all the courts to abide the event. Prior to handing down the decision the opinion was amended by striking out the words “ to the appellants,” but owing to an oversight these words were not stricken from the copy of the opinion sent to the state reporter, and it was erroneously reported in 178 N. Y. 364, in its unamended form.

Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Yann and Werner, JJ., concur.

Motion denied.

Johnson v. . Cole, 72 N.E. 1146, 180 N.Y. 530, 1905 N.Y. LEXIS 1113 (N.Y. 1905).

Pincite

72 N.E. 1146 (Johnson v. . Cole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related