JOHNSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided September 20, 2024·No. 2:24-cv-01304·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CASSANDRA JOHNSON, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff,

v.

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE- NO. 24CV1304 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Defendants.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 20th day of September, 2024, upon consideration of the United States of America’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No 12), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (ECF No 14), and the United States of America’s Response in Support (ECF No. 15), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States of America’s Motion is GRANTED and that Plaintiff’s claim against the United States of America and the National Park Service–Department of the Interior is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.1

BY THE COURT:

/S/WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.

_______________________________ WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.

1 Although only the United States may be sued under the FTCA, 28 U.S.C. § 2679(a), (b), (d); CNA v. United States, 535 F.3d 132, 138 & n.2 (3d Cir. 2008), Johnson also sued the City of Philadelphia, which has filed a cross-claim against the other Defendants. To the extent that the City of Philadelphia wishes to dismiss such cross-claim it should so state in a filing on the docket.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOHNSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, (E.D. Pa. 2024).

JOHNSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA (JOHNSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cna v. United States
535 F.3d 132 (Third Circuit, 2008)