Johnson v. City of Kansas City

Missouri Court of Appeals

Johnson v. City of Kansas City

203 S.W.3d 235, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1491, 2006 WL 2861058

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 10, 2006·No. No. WD 66400·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kelly Johnson appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s order denying her claim for unemployment benefits pursuant to Missouri’s Employment Security Law, § 288.010, et seq. It determined Ms. Johnson was disqualified from receiving benefits because she left work voluntarily without good cause attributable [236] to the work or to her employer. On appeal, Ms. Johnson claims that the evidence showed that she did not leave work voluntarily and that even if she did leave voluntarily, she did so with good cause. The Commission’s order is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kelly Johnson appeals the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s order denying her claim for unemployment benefits pursuant to Missouri’s Employment Security Law, § 288.010, et seq. It determined Ms. Johnson was disqualified from receiving benefits because she left work voluntarily without good cause attributable [236] to the work or to her employer. On appeal, Ms. Johnson claims that the evidence showed that she did not leave work voluntarily and that even if she did leave voluntarily, she did so with good cause. The Commission’s order is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Johnson v. City of Kansas City, 203 S.W.3d 235, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1491, 2006 WL 2861058 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

203 S.W.3d 235 (Johnson v. City of Kansas City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.