Johnson v. City of Jacksonville
This text of 24 So. 2d 717 (Johnson v. City of Jacksonville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a suit for damages caused by personal injuries resulting from one of the plaintiffs driving an automobile into a hole which had recently occurred in a paved street of the City of Jacksonville and which hole was caused by the washing out of the foundation from under the pavement.
*15 At the close of plaintiff’s testimony, defendant moved for a directed verdict and upon the court intimating that the motion would be granted, the plaintiff took non-suit with bill of exceptions.
Without applying the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur plaintiff’s evidence was insufficient to establish liability of defendant.
The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur does not apply to this case. See 25 Am. Juris, pages 853, 854.
There is nothing in the evidence to show that the defendant either knew, or should with reasonable diligence have known, of the alleged defect in the street.
The judgment is affirmed.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 So. 2d 717, 157 Fla. 14, 1946 Fla. LEXIS 648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-city-of-jacksonville-fla-1946.