Johnson v. City of Evansville

180 N.E. 603, 95 Ind. App. 710, 1932 Ind. App. LEXIS 132
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. City of Evansville. Read the opinion of the Court — 95 Ind. App. 417
Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided March 30, 1932·No. No. 14,279.·Published

Opinion

Curtis, J.

— This was an action by the appellant against the City of Evansville, appellee, to recover for loss of services, doctor, nurse, and hospital bills and other expenses occasioned by injuries to appellant’s wife alleged to have been sustained by her in a fall *711 upon ice in an alley in said city. She also filed a suit against the City for her damages alleged to have been sustained by her in said fall. The appellee filed a demurrer to the complaint in each action which raised the same legal questions in both cases as to the sufficiency of the complaints. The demurrers were each sustained and this action of the trial court is the only error assigned in each ease. The appeal of the wife was determined in this court in the case of Frances Johnson v. City of Evansville (1933), ante 417, 180 N. E. 600, wherein the judgment of the trial court was affirmed. Upon the authority of that case the judgment in the instant case is likewise affirmed.

Judgment affirmed..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. City of Evansville, 180 N.E. 603, 95 Ind. App. 710, 1932 Ind. App. LEXIS 132 (Ind. Ct. App. 1932).

180 N.E. 603 (Johnson v. City of Evansville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. City of Evansville
180 N.E. 600 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1932)