Johnson v. City of Chesapeake

50 F. App'x 608
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 7, 2002·No. No. 02-1371·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Veronica Moody Johnson and Christopher Lee Johnson appeal the district court’s orders: (1) granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss in part; and (2) granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Johnson v. City of Chesapeake, No. CA-99-736-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 10, 2001 & March 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. City of Chesapeake, 50 F. App'x 608 (4th Cir. 2002).

50 F. App'x 608 (Johnson v. City of Chesapeake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. City of Chesapeake, Virginia
538 U.S. 1034 (Supreme Court, 2003)