Johnson v. City of Birmingham

52 So. 2d 237, 36 Ala. App. 38, 1951 Ala. App. LEXIS 370
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 13, 1951
Docket6 Div. 74
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 So. 2d 237 (Johnson v. City of Birmingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. City of Birmingham, 52 So. 2d 237, 36 Ala. App. 38, 1951 Ala. App. LEXIS 370 (Ala. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

CARR, Presiding Judge.

The accused was convicted in the circuit court for possessing lottery tickets in violation of Sec. 600 of the 1944 General Code of the City of Birmingham.

The only insistence in brief of counsel for appellant is that the above ordinance is unconstitutional.

[39]*39This question has been settled adversely to appellant’s contention in the recent cases of City of Birmingham v. Reed, Ala.App., 44 So.2d 607; Fiorella v. City of Birmingham, 35 Ala.App. 384, 48 So.2d 761, certiorari denied 254 Ala.App. 515, 48 So.2d 768.

The judgment of the court below is ordered affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. City of Birmingham
52 So. 2d 237 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 So. 2d 237, 36 Ala. App. 38, 1951 Ala. App. LEXIS 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-city-of-birmingham-alactapp-1951.