Johnson v. City of Birmingham

Alabama Court of Appeals

Johnson v. City of Birmingham

52 So. 2d 237, 36 Ala. App. 38, 1951 Ala. App. LEXIS 370

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided March 13, 1951·No. 6 Div. 74·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CARR, Presiding Judge.

The accused was convicted in the circuit court for possessing lottery tickets in violation of Sec. 600 of the 1944 General Code of the City of Birmingham.

The only insistence in brief of counsel for appellant is that the above ordinance is unconstitutional.

[39]*39This question has been settled adversely to appellant’s contention in the recent cases of City of Birmingham v. Reed, Ala.App., 44 So.2d 607; Fiorella v. City of Birmingham, 35 Ala.App. 384, 48 So.2d 761, certiorari denied 254 Ala.App. 515, 48 So.2d 768.

The judgment of the court below is ordered affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CARR, Presiding Judge.

The accused was convicted in the circuit court for possessing lottery tickets in violation of Sec. 600 of the 1944 General Code of the City of Birmingham.

The only insistence in brief of counsel for appellant is that the above ordinance is unconstitutional.

[39]*39This question has been settled adversely to appellant’s contention in the recent cases of City of Birmingham v. Reed, Ala.App., 44 So.2d 607; Fiorella v. City of Birmingham, 35 Ala.App. 384, 48 So.2d 761, certiorari denied 254 Ala.App. 515, 48 So.2d 768.

The judgment of the court below is ordered affirmed.

Affirmed.

Johnson v. City of Birmingham, 52 So. 2d 237, 36 Ala. App. 38, 1951 Ala. App. LEXIS 370 (Ala. Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

52 So. 2d 237 (Johnson v. City of Birmingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related