Johnson v. City of Birmingham
This text of 52 So. 2d 237 (Johnson v. City of Birmingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The accused was convicted in the circuit court for possessing lottery tickets in violation of Sec. 600 of the 1944 General Code of the City of Birmingham.
The only insistence in brief of counsel for appellant is that the above ordinance is unconstitutional.
[39]*39This question has been settled adversely to appellant’s contention in the recent cases of City of Birmingham v. Reed, Ala.App., 44 So.2d 607; Fiorella v. City of Birmingham, 35 Ala.App. 384, 48 So.2d 761, certiorari denied 254 Ala.App. 515, 48 So.2d 768.
The judgment of the court below is ordered affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 So. 2d 237, 36 Ala. App. 38, 1951 Ala. App. LEXIS 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-city-of-birmingham-alactapp-1951.