Johnson v. City of Atlanta

28 S.E.2d 580, 70 Ga. App. 473, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 5
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 5, 1944
Docket30311.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 28 S.E.2d 580 (Johnson v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. City of Atlanta, 28 S.E.2d 580, 70 Ga. App. 473, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 5 (Ga. Ct. App. 1944).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted in the recorder’s court of the City of Atlanta of violating section 59-304 of the ordinances of the city, in that he was carrying on a business “required to be registered, without registering and paying the required license tax thereon.” His defense was that he was not guilty because his place of business was at 1300 Howell Mill Road, and he introduced evidence to that effect. However, there was no testimony or evidence in the petition for certiorari that 1200 Howell Mill Road was outside the city limits of Atlanta; and this court can not take judicial notice as to whether it was outside or inside of said limits.

The judge did not err in dismissing the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Buice v. SATELLITE SECURITY CORPORATION
274 S.E.2d 608 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Taylor v. MALDEN TRUST COMPANY
187 S.E.2d 307 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 S.E.2d 580, 70 Ga. App. 473, 1944 Ga. App. LEXIS 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-city-of-atlanta-gactapp-1944.