Johnson v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.

3 F. App'x 17
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 148 F.3d 373
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 23, 2001·No. Nos. 00-2144, 00-2145, 00-2146·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joseph R. Johnson appeals the district court’s orders denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60 motions and his motion to vacate the judgment and remand for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district [18]*18court. Johnson v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., Nos. CA-98-1407-A; CA-99-695-A; CA-99-696-A (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 1, 2000, entered Aug. 7, 2000; filed Aug. 3, 2000, entered Aug. 7, 2000; filed Aug. 15, 2000, entered Aug. 19, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., 3 F. App'x 17 (4th Cir. 2001).

3 F. App'x 17 (Johnson v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.