Johnson v. Churchill, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Johnson v. Churchill, Inc.

188 So. 2d 14, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5045

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 5, 1966

DocketNo. 66-387

StatusPublished

This text of 188 So. 2d 14 (Johnson v. Churchill, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Churchill, Inc., 188 So. 2d 14, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5045 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, a former employee of the plaintiff (appellee), appeals a temporary restraining order which enforces a noncompetitive agreement.¹ The chancellor determined that the agreement was reasonable, but he reduced the area in which the injunction would operate. We affirm. See Davis v. Ebsco Industries, Inc., Fla.App.1963, 150 So.2d 460; American Building Maintenance Co. of Oakland v. Fogelman, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 791.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, a former employee of the plaintiff (appellee), appeals a temporary restraining order which enforces a noncompetitive agreement.¹ The chancellor determined that the agreement was reasonable, but he reduced the area in which the injunction would operate. We affirm. See Davis v. Ebsco Industries, Inc., Fla.App.1963, 150 So.2d 460; American Building Maintenance Co. of Oakland v. Fogelman, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 791.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 So. 2d 14, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-churchill-inc-fladistctapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack