Johnson v. Churchill, Inc.

188 So. 2d 14, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5045
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 5, 1966·No. No. 66-387·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, a former employee of the plaintiff (appellee), appeals a temporary restraining order which enforces a noncompetitive agreement.1 The chancellor determined that the agreement was reasonable, but he reduced the area in which the injunction would operate. We affirm. See Davis v. Ebsco Industries, Inc., Fla.App.1963, 150 So.2d 460; American Building Maintenance Co. of Oakland v. Fogelman, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 791.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Churchill, Inc., 188 So. 2d 14, 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5045 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

188 So. 2d 14 (Johnson v. Churchill, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

AMERICAN BUILDING MAIN. CO. OF OAKLAND v. Fogelman
167 So. 2d 791 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Davis v. Ebsco Industries, Inc.
150 So. 2d 460 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)