Johnson v. Chapin

299 A.D.2d 294, 749 N.Y.S.2d 723, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11541
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 26, 2002·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered May 16, 2002, which, in this matrimonial action, granted, in part, plaintiff’s motion for pendente lite relief, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant has not demonstrated any basis for affording him [295] relief from the interim award. Indeed, the motion court, when confronted with defendant’s apparently self-created unemployment and questionable claim of limited future earnings, was warranted in imputing income to him on the basis of his past earnings and earning capacity (see Kent v Kent, 291 AD2d 258, 259).

We have considered defendant’s various arguments and find them all unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Rosenberger, Rubin and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Chapin, 299 A.D.2d 294, 749 N.Y.S.2d 723, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

299 A.D.2d 294 (Johnson v. Chapin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zappin v. Comfort
2017 NY Slip Op 8180 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)