Johnson v. Cerretta Dietrich, Inc.

254 A.D. 749, 4 N.Y.S.2d 68, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7459

This text of 254 A.D. 749 (Johnson v. Cerretta Dietrich, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Cerretta Dietrich, Inc., 254 A.D. 749, 4 N.Y.S.2d 68, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7459 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Action by plaintiff, here appellant, to recover from defendant, here respondent, damages for personal injuries sustained by reason of defendant’s alleged negligence in the maintenance, in an insecure condition, of a certain roof porch railing of a house then being repaired by defendant, against which railing plaintiff leaned and fell to the ground. . The issues were tried before the court and a jury. At the close of the proofs defendant moved to dismiss the complaint. The trial justice reserved decision upon that motion and submitted the issues to the jury, who rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff. The reserved motion was then granted and the complaint was dismissed. From an order setting aside the verdict and dismissing the complaint and from the judgment entered thereon plaintiff appeals. Order and judgment severally affirmed, with costs. The plaintiff was not an invitee of the defendant upon the roof porch thus being repaired by the latter. He was at most a bare licensee. Upon the undisputed proof, the defendant was not liable [750]*750to him. (Barrett v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 188 App. Div. 109, 111; affd., 231 N. Y. 605; Mendelowitz v. Neisner, 258 id. 181, 184.) Hagarty, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Davis, J., dissent and vote to reverse and to reinstate the verdict, with the following memorandum: Plaintiff had been invited by defendant to the building where he was hurt. He was an invitee at the place where the accident occurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barrett v. . the Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company
132 N.E. 906 (New York Court of Appeals, 1921)
Barrett v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad
188 A.D. 109 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D. 749, 4 N.Y.S.2d 68, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-cerretta-dietrich-inc-nyappdiv-1938.