Johnson v. Central Life Assurance Co.
This text of 227 N.W.2d 823 (Johnson v. Central Life Assurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial following a jury verdict for the defendant.
This is an action to recover the proceeds of a life insurance policy in which the defense was a failure to disclose material facts concerning the insured’s prior medical history.
We have carefully reviewed the record and considered all of the issues raised by plaintiff. We conclude that the matter was properly submitted to the jury by the trial court, and errors which allegedly occurred were not prejudicial.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
227 N.W.2d 823, 303 Minn. 566, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-central-life-assurance-co-minn-1975.