Johnson v. Central Life Assurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Johnson v. Central Life Assurance Co.

227 N.W.2d 823, 303 Minn. 566, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1586

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided April 4, 1975·No. No. 44798·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial following a jury verdict for the defendant.

This is an action to recover the proceeds of a life insurance policy in which the defense was a failure to disclose material facts concerning the insured’s prior medical history.

We have carefully reviewed the record and considered all of the issues raised by plaintiff. We conclude that the matter was properly submitted to the jury by the trial court, and errors which allegedly occurred were not prejudicial.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial following a jury verdict for the defendant.

This is an action to recover the proceeds of a life insurance policy in which the defense was a failure to disclose material facts concerning the insured’s prior medical history.

We have carefully reviewed the record and considered all of the issues raised by plaintiff. We conclude that the matter was properly submitted to the jury by the trial court, and errors which allegedly occurred were not prejudicial.

Affirmed.

Johnson v. Central Life Assurance Co., 227 N.W.2d 823, 303 Minn. 566, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1586 (Mich. 1975).

Pincite

227 N.W.2d 823 (Johnson v. Central Life Assurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.