Johnson v. Carey
Opinion
1 2 3
4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT AT SEATTLE 7 INGRID JOHNSON, CASE NO. C25-0564-KKE 8
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING SECOND MOTION TO 9 v. REOPEN
10 MONICA CARY, in her official capacity as King County Family Court Judge, 11
Defendant. 12
13 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s second motion to reopen her case under 14 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Dkt. No. 16. 15 The Court previously dismissed the case with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) 16 because “the sole defendant in this case has absolute immunity from Plaintiff’s claims, and the 17 Younger abstention doctrine applies, [so] the Court lacks jurisdiction over this case.” Dkt. No. 12 18 at 4. The Court then rejected Plaintiff’s motion to reopen the case under Federal Rule of Civil 19 Procedure 60(b)(1) and (6) because the motion “fail[ed] to identify any mistake that would warrant 20 setting aside the judgment and reinforce[d] that judicial immunity and the Younger abstention 21 doctrine apply.” Dkt. No. 15 at 2. 22 Plaintiff now moves to reopen the case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(2), 23 (3), and (6) because “[n]ew evidence confirms that Plaintiff’s emergency filings were obstructed 24 on four separate occasions.” Dkt. No. 16 at 1. A court may grant a motion for relief from judgment 1 pursuant to Rule 60(b) only “upon a showing of (1) mistake, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) 2 newly discovered evidence; (3) fraud; (4) a void judgment; (5) a satisfied or discharged judgment; 3 or (6) extraordinary circumstances which would justify relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Plaintiff’s
4 motion does not include evidence or argument that could undermine the Court’s previous holding 5 that Judge Cary is entitled to absolute judicial immunity. See e.g., Munoz v. Superior Ct. of Los 6 Angeles Cnty., 91 F.4th 977, 981 (9th Cir. 2024). 7 Plaintiff’s motion to reopen the case is DENIED. Dkt. No. 16. The case shall remain 8 closed. 9 Dated this 6th day of June, 2025. 10 A 11 Kymberly K. Evanson 12 United States District Judge
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. Carey (Johnson v. Carey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.