Johnson v. Caldwell

38 Tex. 217
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 38 Tex. 217 (Johnson v. Caldwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Caldwell, 38 Tex. 217 (Tex. 1873).

Opinion

Walker. J.

This is an action of trespass to try title. The plaintiffs claim under a sheriff’s deed made in pursuance of a sale which it is claimed was irregular and void.

The sheriff levied on the property, but suffered the execution to become dead in his hands before making a sale. A term of the District Court having intervened, the sher[219]*219iff proceeded to sell without an execution, or venditioni exponas.

In Towns v. Harris et al., 13 Texas, 507, it was held that a sale of real property made in this State after the return day of the execution, was void.

So far as any title to the purchaser is concerned, we hold the same doctrine; but in Howard v. North, 5 Texas, 390, the court, in treating a case of this kind, held that where a sale on execution under a valid judgment is void, and the debtor brings suit to recover the property, if there is no fraud on the part of the purchaser he will not be compelled to restore the property, without being reimbursed the amount which he paid, and which went to discharge the judgment.

This, too, is an equitable doctrine of the law, and we think should be carried out in this case.

We have not thought it necessary to lay down this rule in Grace v. Garnett, for the reason that in that case there are evidently strong presumptions of fraud in the sale, if indeed any sale were made, which is not shown by the constable’s return.

The court properly ruled out the sheriff’s deed in this case, but as we think without protecting the appellants’ equitable right to recover back the purchase money in the absence of any proof of fraud in the sale.

The judgment is therefore reversed and the cause remanded, to be proceeded in, in accordance with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jarrett v. Ross
132 S.W.2d 286 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Tanner v. Grisham
295 S.W. 590 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Tex. 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-caldwell-tex-1873.