Johnson v. Cain
This text of 966 So. 2d 1245 (Johnson v. Cain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
WALTER E. JOHNSON, JR.
v.
N. BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, ET AL.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
WALTER E. JOHNSON, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, In Proper Person.
L. BRUCE DODD, Attorney for Defendant-Appellee, Richard Stalder.
Before CARTER, C.J., PETTIGREW, and WELCH, JJ.
PETTIGREW, J.
In this case, petitioner, an inmate in the custody of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections ("DPSC"), sought review of Administrative Remedy Procedure No. LSP-2003-3946, concerning the reduction/taking of his incentive wages without due process. Following a de novo review of the record herein, including the traversal by petitioner and the Commissioner's Report, the trial court maintained the decision by DPSC, dismissing petitioner's suit with prejudice. This appeal followed. After a thorough review of the record and relevant jurisprudence, we find no error of law or abuse of discretion by the trial court. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment in accordance with Uniform Rules Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-16.2A(5), (6), (7), and (8). All costs associated with this appeal are assessed against petitioner, Walter E. Johnson, Jr.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
966 So. 2d 1245, 2007 WL 3355702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-cain-lactapp-2007.