Johnson v. Burns

80 Ind. 130
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1881
DocketNo. 8727
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 80 Ind. 130 (Johnson v. Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Burns, 80 Ind. 130 (Ind. 1881).

Opinion

Woods, J.

— The appellant filed a claim against the appellee as administrator of the estate of Mary Ayers, for alleged services as an attorney in the defence of her son, against a charge of murder. The court refused to allow the claim, and the appellant insists that the decision is contrary to the evidence.

There was the direct testimony of four witnesses, including-the appellant, who was called by the court, tending strongly to establish the claim; but there was very strong circumstantial evidence to the contrary. The settled practice of this court is not to reconsider the findings of the nisi prius courts upon questions of fact, if there is in the record any evidence which fairly tends to support the finding, and especially must this be so where the decision is against the party which had the burden of the issue.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lamson v. First National Bank
82 Ind. 21 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 Ind. 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-burns-ind-1881.