Johnson v. Buckner

Supreme Court of Missouri

Johnson v. Buckner

4 Mo. 624

DecidedMay 15, 1837

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Mo. 624 (Johnson v. Buckner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Buckner, 4 Mo. 624 (Mo. 1837).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion, delivered by

Tompkins, Judge.

On the part of the plaintiff in error, it is contended, that the promissory note declared on, being made bie seven months alter the date thereof, the plea should have been, that the plaintiff’s right of action did not crue within ten years, &c. And such seems to be the rule ol pleading ma case like this; — see Hodsden vs. Harridge, 2 Saunders, p. 636, note 5. It seems to us that the circuit court committed error in overruling f he demurrer to the second plea of the defendant. Its judgment is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion, delivered by

Tompkins, Judge.

On the part of the plaintiff in error, it is contended, that the promissory note declared on, being made bie seven months alter the date thereof, the plea should have been, that the plaintiff’s right of action did not crue within ten years, &c. And such seems to be the rule ol pleading ma case like this; — see Hodsden vs. Harridge, 2 Saunders, p. 636, note 5. It seems to us that the circuit court committed error in overruling f he demurrer to the second plea of the defendant. Its judgment is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Mo. 624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-buckner-mo-1837.