Johnson v. Bryant

Fourth Circuit

Johnson v. Bryant

474 F. App'x 105

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 6, 2012

DocketNos. 12-1055, 12-1057

StatusPublished

This text of 474 F. App'x 105 (Johnson v. Bryant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Bryant, 474 F. App'x 105 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

[106]*106Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Brad R. Johnson appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to the Appellants and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s orders and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Johnson v. Bryant, Nos. 3:09-cv-00102-TLW; 4:08-cv-02726-TLW, 2011 WL 4483642 (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2011); (Dec. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[106]*106Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Brad R. Johnson appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to the Appellants and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s orders and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Johnson v. Bryant, Nos. 3:09-cv-00102-TLW; 4:08-cv-02726-TLW, 2011 WL 4483642 (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2011); (Dec. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

474 F. App'x 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-bryant-ca4-2012.