Johnson v. Brunson & Slutter

1 White & W. 482
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 28, 1883
DocketNo, 1457, Op. Book No. 2, p. 752
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 482 (Johnson v. Brunson & Slutter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Brunson & Slutter, 1 White & W. 482 (Tex. Ct. App. 1883).

Opinion

Opinion by

Hurt, J.

§ 842. Attachment bond; must be conditioned to pay costs. The attachment bond in this case omitted the-words “and costs” in the conditional part of it. Held. [483]*483that the bond was fatalty defective, and the appellant’s motion to quash it should have been sustained. The statute plainly requires that one of the conditions of the bond shall be that the obligors will pay the costs that may be adjudged against them, etc. [R. S. 156-158.] This being the case, the bond must literally follow the language of the statute, or it must use words which fully and clearly embrace the conditions prescribed by it. [Reid v. Fernandez, 52 Tex. 379.]

February 28, 1883.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reid v. Fernandez
52 Tex. 379 (Texas Supreme Court, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-brunson-slutter-texapp-1883.