Johnson v. Brooks

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 8, 2002·No. 02-6024·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6024

JOHN HENRY JOHNSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOSEPH M. BROOKS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-01-851)

Submitted: March 20, 2002 Decided: April 8, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Henry Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

John Henry Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Brooks, No. CA-01-851

(E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. Brooks, (4th Cir. 2002).

Johnson v. Brooks (Johnson v. Brooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related