Johnson v. Breitenstein

241 So. 3d 280
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 30, 2018
DocketNo. 1D17–1740
StatusPublished

This text of 241 So. 3d 280 (Johnson v. Breitenstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Breitenstein, 241 So. 3d 280 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED . See Caldwell v. Fla. Dept of Elder Affairs , 121 So.3d 1062, 1064 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (" 'Claims for which an appellant has not presented an argument, or for which he provides only conclusory argument, are insufficiently presented for review and are waived.' ") (quoting Hammond v. State , 34 So.3d 58, 59 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) ).

Rowe, Ray, and Makar, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hammond v. State
34 So. 3d 58 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Caldwell v. Florida Department of Elder Affairs
121 So. 3d 1062 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 So. 3d 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-breitenstein-fladistctapp-2018.