Johnson v. Brannon
This text of 178 N.W. 945 (Johnson v. Brannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
-In this action plaintiff claimed to recover for the burning, at defendant’s behest, of several acres of millet which had been cut and was lying on defendant’s ground. The jury awarded plaintiff $420. The court ordered that a new trial be granted unless the plaintiff should consent to a reduction to $270, which was done. Defendant appeals.
There are no assignments of error, consequently there is nothing for us to review. Supreme Court rule 4 (170 N. W. vii). But if there had been assignments of error there would still be no merit in the appeal.
The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 N.W. 945, 43 S.D. 310, 1920 S.D. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-brannon-sd-1920.