Johnson v. Brannon

178 N.W. 945, 43 S.D. 310, 1920 S.D. LEXIS 94
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 25, 1920
DocketFile No. 4711
StatusPublished

This text of 178 N.W. 945 (Johnson v. Brannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Brannon, 178 N.W. 945, 43 S.D. 310, 1920 S.D. LEXIS 94 (S.D. 1920).

Opinion

GATES, J.

-In this action plaintiff claimed to recover for the burning, at defendant’s behest, of several acres of millet which had been cut and was lying on defendant’s ground. The jury awarded plaintiff $420. The court ordered that a new trial be granted unless the plaintiff should consent to a reduction to $270, which was done. Defendant appeals.

There are no assignments of error, consequently there is nothing for us to review. Supreme Court rule 4 (170 N. W. vii). But if there had been assignments of error there would still be no merit in the appeal.

The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

WHITING, J., not sitting. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 N.W. 945, 43 S.D. 310, 1920 S.D. LEXIS 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-brannon-sd-1920.