Johnson v. Boyd
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7624
LARRY D. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FLORA BOYD, Administrator; KERSHAW COUNTY; THOMAS WILLIAMS, Assistant Administrator, Kershaw County Detention Center; STEVE MCCASKELL, Sheriff Kershaw County; LEE BOAN, City Investigator; THOMAS WILLIAMS, Chief Correctional Officer; SHERIFF DEPUTY HATHWAY; MARY ANDERSON, Correctional Officer; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ALEXANDER; MS. CLAXTON, Classification Specialist; NURSE COOK, Detention Center Medical Staff,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA-04-23044-6-TLW)
Submitted: June 15, 2006 Decided: June 19, 2006
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. James Miller Davis, Jr., DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; Donna Seegars Givens, WOODS & GIVENS, LLP, Lexington, South Carolina; Robert Holmes Hood, HOOD LAW FIRM, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Larry D. Johnson appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Boyd, No.
CA-04-23044-6-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Johnson v. Boyd (Johnson v. Boyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.