Johnson v. Borough
120 A.3d 992, 632 Pa. 439, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 1617
This text of 120 A.3d 992 (Johnson v. Borough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Johnson v. Borough, 120 A.3d 992, 632 Pa. 439, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 1617 (Pa. 2015).
Opinion
[440]*440 ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED to the following issues, as stated by Petitioner:
a. Whether the Commonwealth Court committed reversible error by holding that a common pleas court’s standard of review of a civil service commission adjudication is de novo, where a common pleas court takes no additional evidence on appeal and limits itself to the record before the commission?
b. Whether the Commonwealth Court committed reversible error by holding that a common pleas court may modify a penalty imposed by a municipality, where there is no evidence whatsoever that the penalty was arbitrary, capricious, or discriminatory?
In all other respects, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
120 A.3d 992, 632 Pa. 439, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 1617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-borough-pa-2015.