Johnson v. Boone's Administrator

2 Del. 172
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedJuly 5, 1837
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Del. 172 (Johnson v. Boone's Administrator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Johnson v. Boone's Administrator, 2 Del. 172 (Del. Ct. App. 1837).

Opinion

Per curiam.

Where there are distinct demands against a firm, and the individuals of the firm, if money of the partners be paid, though generally, it cannot be applied to the individual debt; and so, vice versa, a payment by the individual cannot be credited to the partnership account, unless there be evidence of consent. Roscoe Evid. 248-9. If this was a payment by Boone individually, the plaintiff must show his consent to the application he has made of it, or that such was at the time Boone’s intention; otherwise it must now be credited to the “ Hermit.” The draft was probably inclosed in a letter, and which would show, perhaps, on what account the money was paid.

Verdict for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Del. 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-boones-administrator-delsuperct-1837.