Johnson v. Boone

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1114

RALPH E. JOHNSON, JR.; VIRGINIA DARDEN,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

DAVID E. BOONE; DAVID E. BOONE, INCORPORATED, a Virginia corporation; BOONE, BEALE, COSBY, AND LONG, a professional corporation; BOONE, BEALE, COSBY, AND LONG, an unincorporated partnership,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:09-cv-00808-HEH)

Submitted: March 30, 2010 Decided: April 6, 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ralph E. Johnson, Jr., Virginia Darden, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ralph E. Johnson, Jr., and Virginia Darden appeal the

district court’s order dismissing their complaint as frivolous

and for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(i), (ii) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Johnson v. Boone, No.

3:09-cv-00808-HEH (E.D. Va. Dec. 23, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED